What is RBI Monetary Policy? Monetary policy is the macroeconomic policy laid down by the Reserve Bank of India. It involves the management of money supply and interest rates. The central bank tweaks interest rates to achieve macroeconomic objectives such as liquidity, consumption and inflation.
What are repo rate and reverse repo rate? Repo rate is the rate at which RBI lends money to the commercial banks. The rate is used by monetary authorities to control inflation. On the other hand, reverse repo is the rate at which commercial banks park their money with the central bank. At present, repo rate and reverse repo rate stand at 5.15 per cent and 4.90 per cent, respectively.
When is RBI Monetary Policy? RBI monetary policy committee will meet during February 4-6 for its sixth bi-monthly Monetary Policy Statement for 2019-20. The resolution of the MPC will be placed on the website at 11.45 AM on February 6, 2020.
The composition of the current and first monetary policy committee is as follows:
Governor of the Reserve Bank of India – Chairperson, ex officio –Shaktikanta Das
Executive director of the Bank in charge of monetary policy — Dr. Janak Raj
Shri Chetan Ghate, Professor, Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) – Member;
Professor Pami Dua, Director, Delhi School of Economics – Member;
Dr. Ravindra H. Dholakia, Professor, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad – Member
Members referred to at 4 to 6 above, will hold office for a period of four years from the date of appointment while the other three members are official. All the central government nominees are not eligible to be re-appointed.
Will RBI cut policy rates on February 6? A Reuters poll of economists, conducted before Budget showed that the central bank is expected to keep the repo rate unchanged until at least October, when it is seen resuming its easing path. RBI is now forecast to next cut rates by 25 basis points to 4.90 per cent in the October-December quarter, though some analysts reckon the central bank will keep rates on hold for longer.
This guest blog is contributed by our student Ms. Krina Shah.
We are welcoming all you budding finance professionals to come contribute your interesting articles about Economics, Finance, Stock Markets & more as a guest blogger on our Website!
Do write to use if you want to get featured here! So hurry up, happy writing, happy reading! – EduInvest Academy
IFRS 16 was
issued in January 2016 and applies to annual reporting periods beginning on or
after 1 January 2019. Under IFRS 16, there is
no classification for operating leases and capital leases. There is only one
umbrella for all leases – finance leases. Per the new rules, all leases must be
accounted for on your balance sheet. Because your leases are no longer classified,
you no longer need to use separate calculations – straight-lined vs. an outline
of your interest and depreciation expense.
Under IFRS 16,
all leases will be calculated using your interest expense and depreciation
expense. Instead all recognised leases are treated in a similar way to finance
leases applying IAS 17.
Following are the criteria for identification of Lease:
The fact that a contract is labelled a lease
does not necessarily mean it is or contains a lease.
One of the key considerations is to evaluate
whether the customer has the right to control the use of the identified asset.
The control assessment is focused on decision-making rights.
Does the entity have the right to obtain
substantially all the economic benefits from the use of the identified asset?
Does the entity have the right to direct the
use of the identified asset?
An identified
asset is an asset that is either explicitly identified in the contract or is
implicitly specified by being identified at the time that the asset is made available
for use by the customer. Even if an asset is explicitly specified, a customer
does not have the right to use an identified asset if the supplier has a
substantive substitution right throughout the period of use.
Can a portion of an asset be an identified asset?
Yes, a portion
of an asset is an identified asset if it is physically distinct (example: a
single floor of an apartment building). Where a portion of an asset is not
physically distinct (example: 20% of the capacity of an oil pipeline), the
portion of the asset is not an identified asset unless it represents substantially
all of the capacity of the asset. If neither of these situations exist, the
customer is not provided with the right to obtain substantially all the
economic benefits from use of the asset and an identified asset does not exist.
For better understanding of the identification of lease we shall
use following example:
Example 1 – Rail cars
In a contract
between a customer and a supplier, the supplier needs to transport goods using
a particular type of rail car in line with a specified timetable over a three-year
period. The timetable and quantity of goods stipulated are equivalent to the
customer having the use of six rail cars for three years. The supplier makes
available the cars, driver and engines as part of the arrangement. The supplier
has a large supply of similar cars and engines that are available to fulfil the
obligations of the arrangement. The rail cars and engines are kept at the
supplier’s premises when they are not being used to transport the goods.
Analysis of the above example
The contract
does not contain a lease of either rail cars or engines. The rail cars and
engines used to transport the customer’s goods are not identified assets. The
supplier has a substantive substitution right to replace the rail cars and
engines as a result of:
Supplier
having the practical ability to substitute each car and engine throughout the
period of use. Alternative cars and engines are readily available to the
supplier and these can be substituted without the customer’s approval, and the
supplier being able to economically benefit from substituting each car and
engine. There would be very little cost associated
Substituting
these assets as the cars and engines are stored at the supplier’s premises and the
supplier has a large pool of similar cars and engines. Therefore, the customer
does not have the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from
the use of an identified rail car or an engine or directs their use. The
supplier chooses which rail cars and engines are used for each delivery and therefore
direct them. It has substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the
rail cars and engines.
As per the above example we understand whether the contract is a
lease or not?
Now let’s
understand what a lease term is, the lease term is defined as “the
non-cancellable period for which a lease has the right to use an underlying
asset, together with both:
Periods
covered by an option to extent the lease if the lessee is reasonably certain to
exercise that option; and
Periods
covered by an option to terminate the lease if the lessee is reasonably certain
not to exercise that option”.
A lease is no
longer enforceable when the lessee and the lessor each has the right to
terminate the lease without permission from the other party with no more than
an insignificant penalty.
IFRS 16 has an exemption
for leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease.
Short-term lease defined as leases that, at the commencement date, have a lease
term of 12 months or less. A lease that contains a purchase option cannot be a
short-term lease. As we move forward, let’s understand what we
really mean by Lease payments, following are the categories
of lease payments:
They
are Fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments, less any lease
incentives
Exercise
price of a purchase option (if reasonably certain of exercise)
Payments
for penalties for terminating the lease (unless reasonably certain not to
exercise)
Variable
lease payments that depend on an index or rate
Residual
value guarantees (lessees: expected payment/lessors: all guarantees
*If the lessee
is reasonably certain to exercise a purchase option, the exercise price is
included as a lease payment.
Lease payments
also include residual value guarantees.
For Example:
Lessee Z has entered into a lease contract with Lessor L to lease a car. The lease term is five years. In addition, Z and L agree on a residual value guarantee – if the fair value of the car at the end of the lease term is below 400, then Z will pay to L an amount equal to the difference between 400 and the fair value of the car. At commencement of the lease, Z expects the fair value of the car at the end of the lease term to be 400. Z therefore includes an amount of zero in the lease payments when calculating its lease liability. Subsequently, Z monitors the expected fair value of the car at the end of the lease term. If the expected fair value of the car falls below 400, then Z will remeasure the lease liability to include the amount expected to be payable under the residual value guarantee, using an unchanged discount rate.
Incremental Borrowing Rate:
The incremental
borrowing rate is the rate of interest that a lessee would have to pay to
borrow with a similar security over a similar term an amount equal to the lease
payments in a similar economic environment. This definition implies that the
incremental borrowing rate is not only a specific for the lessee, but also for
the underlying asset and that’s the reason why you cannot use the same incremental
borrowing rate for all of your leases.
Let me give a few illustrations:
Imagine
you want to lease the valuable land in a high-level area – that’s really a
great value collateral and it affects your incremental borrowing rate. But, if
you would like to lease a car, that’s not so valuable collateral as the land.
In other words, the security is not the same and you would need to apply
different incremental borrowing rate when leasing a car and when leasing a
land.
Imagine
you want to lease a land for 1 mil. CU and a car for 20 000 CU – not the same
level of risk for the bank as not the same amount of funds necessary to borrow.
Imagine
your car leases are for 3 years, but the office lease is for 10 years. I am
quite sure that the interest rate offered by the bank for 3-year loans would be
different from the rate offered for 10- year loans.
Imagine
you want to lease an office space in the capital city centre and a warehouse in
a cheap area of your country. Again, not the same value, strength and environment.
So, how
to determine the incremental borrowing rate
There are 2 basic steps:
Take
some observable rate: Observable rates can be for example the rate on your past
similar borrowings, or the actual offers from your bank for the loans with
similar amount, security and term. Or, if you are renting the property, then
the property yields could be a great start.
Make
adjustments: Adjustment might be needed exactly because your observable rates might
not precisely reflect the lease
For example, when
you take the rates for unsecured loans, then you need to adjust the rates for
the collateral – which is your underlying asset. Or, maybe you took the rates
offered to companies with low credit risk, but your credit profile is worse –
then you need to adjust.
Finally, let me point out the materiality.
It can happen
that you have just a few leases and thus the impact of these adjustments to
observable rates would not be material. In this case, just take the observable
rates and don’t bother with adjustments – they would be costly, judgmental and
immaterial. But, you need to make absolutely sure that you are below your
materiality level.
Lessee initial recognition and measurement
Leases
are ‘capitalised’ by recognising the present value of the lease payments and
showing them either as right-of-use assets or together with property, plant and
equipment.
At
commencement of the lease, record a right of use asset and a lease liability.
The
lease liability is measured at the present value of the future lease payments (fewer
incentives)
A
lessee would also record a right of use asset at the amount of the lease
liability, adjusted for:
any
initial direct costs (incurred by the lessee in arranging the lease)
prepayments
made by the lessee to the lessor
any lease incentives received from the lessor
and finally, if applicable, an estimate of
costs to be incurred by the lessee to dismantle or remove or restore an asset
(or the site on which the asset is located) at the end of the lease term
*IFRS 16 has two
optional recognition exemptions – one for short term leases and one for leases
of low value assets.
For Example: Year One – Beginning of Lease
Lessee enters
into a 10-year lease of property with annual lease payments of $ 50,000 payable
at the beginning of each year. The contract specifies that lease payments will
increase every two years in line with the increase in the Consumer Price Index
for the preceding 24 months.
The Consumer
Price Index (CPI) at the commencement date is 125.
The lessee has
determined the appropriate rate to discount lease payments is 5%. At the commencement
date, the lessee makes the lease payment for the first year and measures the
lease liability at the present value of the remaining nine payments of $
50,000, discounted at the interest rate of 5% per annum, which is $ 355,391.
Lessee initially recognises assets and liabilities in relation to
the lease as follows:
Dr Right-of-use asset $ 405,391
Cr Lease liability $ 355,391
Cr Cash $ 50,000
(lease payment for the first year)
In measuring the
lease liability, the lessee does not make any estimate of how future changes in
CPI will impact future lease payments. Rather it assumes the initial lease
payment will remain constant during the lease term.
Disclosure:
The standard
notes that more information may be necessary on:
the
nature of the lessee’s leasing activities;
future
cash outflows to which the lessee is potentially exposed that are not reflected
in the
Personal finance is defined as the management of money and financial decisions for a person or family including budgeting, investments, retirement planning and investments.
Following are some goals that one can aim for in the early years:
Till 2000, the budget was presented at 5pm on the last working day of February. It was only in 2001 that finance minister Yashwant Sinha changed the practice and the budget began to be introduced at 11am. It is believed that 5pm was the earlier preferred time as it was convenient for the British Parliament (as it was morning for them).
The Union Budget of India has been conventionally tabled in Lok Sabha on the last working day of February up until 2016. From 2017 onwards, the Union Budget has been presented on February 1 following the changes brought up by former FM Arun Jaitley.
The first Indian budget ever was presented by James Wilson, a Scottish economist and politician. He did so as a ‘Finance Member of the India Council’. He was reportedly tasked with establishing a new tax structure in India as well as a new paper currency. However, the most interesting thing about Wilson is that he established The Economist, the weekly magazine which today has a circulation of over a million. Wilson started it as a newspaper.
Until 2016, Railway Budget was presented separately for about 92 years. Later in 2016, former Finance Minister Arun Jaitley amalgamated the Railway Budget with the Union Budget following which in 2017, the Railway Budget was presented along with the Union Budget.
The longest budget speech was delivered by finance minister Arun Jaitley in 2014. It was two and a half hours long and included a five-minute break.
The maximum number of budgets have been presented by Morarji Desai. He presented the budget every year from 1959 to 1963. His second spree was from 1967 to 1969. Apart from this, he presented the interim budget for 1962-63 and 1967-68.
On July 5, Nirmala Sitharaman become the second woman to have presented a budget. The first was Indira Gandhi in 1970-71.
Before the budget finally goes to print, a ceremony is held in the ministry of finance, which is known as ‘the halwa ceremony’. Halwa, a traditional dessert is prepared and distributed to the staff of the ministry. It is after this that the printing of the budget, a very confidential operation, begins.
Every budget is important but few in the history of modern India come close to former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s budget of 1991 in which India’s economy was liberalized.
Recently Franklin India Ultra Short Bond Fund had written off its entire exposure in Vodafone Idea debt security (~4.3%) on increasing concerns of a possible default (due to supreme court rejecting the plea to reconsider its judgement regarding Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) related payments for telecom companies). This led to a one day fall of 4.3% in its NAV!
What Triggered the Mark Down of Vodafone Idea Debt?
This development is largely in lieu of the financial strain that telecom companies such as Vodafone Idea Limited have been going through given their enhanced financial liability. As per the fund house ‘Pursuant to the Honorable Supreme Court (SC) decision on the interpretation of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) for computation of license fee, the financial liabilities of several telecom operators including VIL stand increased significantly. A review petition was filed by VIL before the SC on account of the fast approaching deadline of January 23, 2020 to discharge the dues, and the SC dismissed the review petition on January 16, 2020.’ As per the news reports, with this decision, VIL has admitted its inability to retain financial solvency in the absence of relief measures, given the huge quantum of AGR dues which they are required to pay immediately. Because of the uncertainty arising in the light of the ongoing scenario in case of VIL, the fund house took the decision to proactively mark down its exposure in the debt securities of the company.
Why is Franklin Templeton Not Side Pocketing VIL exposure in it’s schemes?
This could raise a question as to why the fund house didn’t side pocket VIL exposure. And the answer to that is that there has not been any rating action yet on this security, which as of now carries an investment grade rating of either CRISIL BBB- or CARE BBB-. A security can be side pocketed in case of a downgrade to a rating below investment grade.
The Purpose of Proactively Marking Down the Security
As per the fund house, the idea is to protect existing unitholders interest. Infact, the valuation adjustment here only reflects the realisable price of the relevant securities on the date of valuation and does not indicate any reduction or write-off of the amount repayable by VIL.
Moreover, fresh inflows in the schemes having exposure to VIL have been limited to INR 2 lacs per day per fund per investor, till further notice. This limit is imposed only on the new applications received after the cut-off time on 16th January 2020. This is to ensure that the interest of existing unitholders does not get diluted to a large extent in case of debt recovery form VIL.
What is Side-Pocketing?
“Side Pocketing” is a mechanism to separate distressed, illiquid and hard-to-value assets from other more liquid assets in a portfolio. This prevents distressed assets from adversely affecting the returns of the rest of the portfolio. It has been introduced by the regulator (SEBI) to safeguard the interests of small/ retail investors in debt mutual funds.
How does this work?
Side-pocketing involves separation of the mutual fund portfolio into main portfolio and segregated portfolio in case of a credit event (for example, a bond in the mutual fund portfolio is downgraded to below investment grade by any of the rating agencies like CRISIL, ICRA, etc. leading to a drop in the NAV)
To understand this with an example, consider a mutual fund where an investor holds 100 units at NAV of INR 20 (portfolio value INR 2,000).
One bond in the mutual fund portfolio, which was earlier contributing INR 3 to the NAV, is downgraded and now contributes INR 2 to the NAV. Hence the investor’s portfolio value has dropped from INR 2,000 to INR 1,900
The AMC now separates the downgraded bond into the segregated portfolio and the rest remains in the main portfolio
Consequently, the investor will get 100 units each in both portfolios. Main portfolio will have NAV of INR 17 and segregated/ side pocketed portfolio has NAV of INR 2
Hence investor portfolio value does not change: Main portfolio = INR 1,700 and segregated/ side pocketed portfolio = INR 200
All buying and selling is allowed only in the main portfolio
Investors cannot freely redeem the segregated portfolio with the AMC and will get back the money sitting here only when AMC is able to recover the money from the bond issuing company
Does it help you?
Remember that it is not just you, the retail investor, who is investing in debt mutual funds. Many debt mutual fund categories see a lot of investment from institutional investors (Investment of Crores of Rupees!!).
Over the past several months, credit events have led to some debt mutual funds witnessing a sharp single day fall in NAV. This leads to large redemption in these funds led by institutional investors. The fund manager is forced to sell good quality investments in the portfolio to meet the redemption. Retail investors in these funds are then left with a portfolio that has a higher concentration of the downgraded/ lower quality bond.
With side-pocketing in place, all investors on the day of the credit event will be treated the same as no investment/ redemption will be allowed until side-pocketing is completed.
Has any AMC implemented this?
At present, SEBI has not mandated AMCs to implement side-pocketing but has left it to the discretion of the AMCs. TATA AMC has introduced side-pocketing in most of their debt and hybrid schemes with effect from 15th June 2019. DHFL Pramerica MF has introduced side-pocketing in two of their Fixed Maturity Plans (FMPs). It remains to be seen if more AMCs will follow suit.
To benefit the society as a whole we need to build large infrastructure projects such as lakes, dams, power plants, roads, factories, warehouses and so on. That is the only way out of poverty. There is not a single developed nation that climbed out of poverty without building industries. The question is how do we get the lands to build those projects?
Almost every piece of land is occupied. Thus, you need to acquire the land for these projects from someone. Given the highly fragment land ownership in India, you need to deal with not just 1 big land owner, but 1000s of small ones.
Why can’t we just buy the normal way?
As I mentioned for each project we have to deal with 100s of even 1000s of sellers. That produces a complex dynamic. What if 990 sellers agree to sell the land and 10 sellers hold out? That would block the project preventing the 990 sellers from having good value for their land as well as not allowing the society to progress.
Why don’t those 10 people sell at the market price like the others? There could be a variety of reasons:
There might be property disputes in the family and no one in a position to call the shots.
They might be obstinate or otherwise too sentimentally attached to that piece of soil.
There could be caste, religious or other clashes that would prevent the 1000 farmers from dealing with the same buyer.
Most importantly, they might be asking for ransom in what the economists call the Holdout problem. That guy with a small land in the center could say that I would give up my land only if you pay me 100 crores. At that point would you either stop the project or pay the ransom? Either thing is unfair to the other people selling at market prices.
In summary, it is not always possible to acquire land for major projects by getting everyone agree. This brutally painful process has made India a very difficult place to run business. India ranks at the rank bottom when it comes to being business friendly(I think in the last decile of the list)
This means, unlike China India doesn’t get enough industrial development from both local investors and foreign investors. Tata had to painfully invest abroad as the domestic investments often get bogged by land acquisition. Despite having a large market, India continues to not have industrial development and that prevents us from getting people out of poverty.
Remember, the only real way to get people out of poverty is by building industries.
Now, we have two choices:
Go ahead with the project by forcefully acquiring land from the minority of holdouts.
Abort the project and get back to poverty.
We have been doing #2 for a long time and have seen China & other countries jump past us. Almost every good economy has a policy for forcefully acquiring land.
So, why is this such as problematic one in India compared to other nations:
India has a very powerful landed class that has brutal hold over the villages and the politics. This group gets much of the subsidy benefits and benefit at the cost of landless labourers who might be better off moving to the industry. The poor landless farmers are in fact very open to foreign investment & land acquisition. However, they have much less voice
India has an unhealthy fear of private enterprises. Many of us believe that India is somehow friendly to entrepreneurs, while every bit of reality point otherwise. Thus, every time India acquires land to build factories our alarmists jump up and down. This possibly stems from an age old distrust of the merchant castes by the priestly castes.
In the name of poor, a small group of landed farming class and an anti-merchant class is holding out ways to acquire land. Without that land acquisition, there won’t be industrial development nor moving people out of poverty.
This is the decision to make
Ultimately we cannot have the cake and eat it too. Either we suffer in the current system with farmers dying everyday & get tortured in poverty or we do what every other successful country have done in the past – industrialization with a forceful land acquisition.